欢迎访问 外汇EA下载与MT4/MT5自动交易资源 - 聚合外汇EA、黄金EA、量化交易工具与自动化交易实战内容。
登录 注册

适合我的 MA 交叉系统 (MA Crossover System that works for me)

author emer | 45 人阅读 | 0 人评论 |
I have decided to start a new thread on this topic as I couldn't find another one where my approach fits and I didn't want to cause confusion by posting about my strategy on other people's threads. I posted the below yesterday on Phillip Nel's 5 Min Intraday System (https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...ntraday-system), hence my reference to Phillip, but then realised he is in the Commercial section, so I'm starting again here under Trading Systems.

==================
I have been a member of FF since 2017, but decided to change my nickname to my real name, so I'm back to being a newbie!

I've been looking for a suitable thread to post my work in and Phillip Nel's work, at least in the earlier pages, is as close as I could find to mine, so it feels right here. But his work is widely respected so I don't really want to get in the way of that. I hope what I post adds value. And as Phillip is a fellow South African, it feels even more like home! Phillip, if you read this, Groete!

I use an 8/21 EMA strategy. There is nothing special about those two numbers. No magic. You could use Phillip's 10/21 EMAs or 10/25 or 6/15, or 12/35, whatever. But I did not suggest 50/200. Smaller MA numbers means the MAs never get very far from price and there is a reason for that - it gives a visual reference for price behaviour, you can judge almost up to the minute how stretched price is from the MAs and whether it is more likely to undergo a correction (reversion to the mean) or to break away from the mean.

This chart summarises my strategy. I wait for a new trend to form, as defined by the EMA crossover, then wait for a pullback to (or close to) the EMAs, which I have now discovered is similar to what Phillip teaches, and then enter a trade. I almost always use stop orders so that if a pullback turns into a reversal, there is less chance of that trade being taken out as price continues the 'wrong' way. Note that I identified a two-bar pullback setup and two inside bar setups. They all represent a pullback, or at least a pause, or a local consolidation period. And after the multi-IB setup, price exploded away. That's just perfect. I look for that kind of setup all the time.

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: usdchf h4.png
Size: 16 KB
usdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png audcad h4.png
usdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png audcad h4.png
usdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png audcad h4.png
usdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png audcad h4.png
usdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png audcad h4.png
usdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png nzdchf h4.png audcad h4.png

📦 帖子附件汇总 (56)

以下是回帖中所有共享的文件(56 个)。

🔐
请登录后参与评论
注册满12小时后评论,即可解锁附件下载
立即登录